<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 611 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261650</link>
    <description>Section 80IB(10) deduction was held allowable for a housing project approved before 1 April 2005, because the 16th floor terrace was not sold as part of the flats and did not form part of the built-up area; only balcony area was treated as included. Payments for business centre and administrative charges to a group concern were found not excessive and the section 40A(2)(b) disallowance was deleted. Indirect expenses were to be apportioned on a work-in-progress basis, not profit basis. Interest disallowance on advances to sister concerns was remanded for verification of sufficient interest-free funds. Sales promotion was allowed subject to a 10% disallowance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2015 08:42:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=390664" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 611 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261650</link>
      <description>Section 80IB(10) deduction was held allowable for a housing project approved before 1 April 2005, because the 16th floor terrace was not sold as part of the flats and did not form part of the built-up area; only balcony area was treated as included. Payments for business centre and administrative charges to a group concern were found not excessive and the section 40A(2)(b) disallowance was deleted. Indirect expenses were to be apportioned on a work-in-progress basis, not profit basis. Interest disallowance on advances to sister concerns was remanded for verification of sufficient interest-free funds. Sales promotion was allowed subject to a 10% disallowance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261650</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>