<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 603 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261642</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal by directing the AO to delete the addition of Rs. 8,50,996 related to gold jewelry and Rs. 80,773 related to cash, while confirming the addition of Rs. 2,25,000 as unexplained cash. The Tribunal considered the jewelry within permissible limits based on CBDT instructions and case law, granting relief to the assessee. The decision was pronounced on 08/07/2015.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2015 08:41:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=390656" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 603 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261642</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal by directing the AO to delete the addition of Rs. 8,50,996 related to gold jewelry and Rs. 80,773 related to cash, while confirming the addition of Rs. 2,25,000 as unexplained cash. The Tribunal considered the jewelry within permissible limits based on CBDT instructions and case law, granting relief to the assessee. The decision was pronounced on 08/07/2015.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261642</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>