<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 1188 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171379</link>
    <description>Refund of service tax on terminal handling charges linked to export of goods was treated as admissible where the export nexus and tax payment were established, and procedural objections could not defeat the claim on merits. However, refund claims filed after the one-year period prescribed in the governing notification were held time-barred, because the limitation condition was mandatory and belated claims could not be entertained. The result was partial relief on the export-related refund claim, with the delayed refund claims rejected as beyond limitation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2015 18:20:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=390626" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 1188 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171379</link>
      <description>Refund of service tax on terminal handling charges linked to export of goods was treated as admissible where the export nexus and tax payment were established, and procedural objections could not defeat the claim on merits. However, refund claims filed after the one-year period prescribed in the governing notification were held time-barred, because the limitation condition was mandatory and belated claims could not be entertained. The result was partial relief on the export-related refund claim, with the delayed refund claims rejected as beyond limitation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171379</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>