<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 1048 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171387</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Bangalore ruled in favor of the appellant in a case concerning the applicability of Notification No. 45/2010-S.T. for exemption related to transmission and distribution of electricity services. The Tribunal held that the appellant&#039;s activities, including installation of distribution systems and transformers, fell within the scope of the exemption provided by the Notification, rejecting arguments to the contrary. Additionally, the Tribunal granted relief to the appellant regarding the denial of the composition scheme benefit, waiving the pre-deposit requirement and issuing a stay against recovery during the appeal process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2015 11:55:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=390622" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 1048 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171387</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Bangalore ruled in favor of the appellant in a case concerning the applicability of Notification No. 45/2010-S.T. for exemption related to transmission and distribution of electricity services. The Tribunal held that the appellant&#039;s activities, including installation of distribution systems and transformers, fell within the scope of the exemption provided by the Notification, rejecting arguments to the contrary. Additionally, the Tribunal granted relief to the appellant regarding the denial of the composition scheme benefit, waiving the pre-deposit requirement and issuing a stay against recovery during the appeal process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171387</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>