<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (10) TMI 530 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171361</link>
    <description>The right to a speedy trial is implicit in Article 21 and applies from FIR registration through investigation, inquiry, trial, appeal, revision, and retrial. Its breach is assessed case by case by balancing the length and cause of delay, the accused&#039;s assertion of the right, the prejudice caused, and the surrounding circumstances, including systemic delay and the accused&#039;s conduct. No rigid outer time-limit is prescribed. Where the prosecution cannot proceed despite repeated opportunities and the delay is not attributable to the accused, the Court may grant appropriate relief, including directions affecting prosecution evidence or expeditious continuation of the trial; on the facts described, relief was granted for violation of the right.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2016 14:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=390611" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (10) TMI 530 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171361</link>
      <description>The right to a speedy trial is implicit in Article 21 and applies from FIR registration through investigation, inquiry, trial, appeal, revision, and retrial. Its breach is assessed case by case by balancing the length and cause of delay, the accused&#039;s assertion of the right, the prejudice caused, and the surrounding circumstances, including systemic delay and the accused&#039;s conduct. No rigid outer time-limit is prescribed. Where the prosecution cannot proceed despite repeated opportunities and the delay is not attributable to the accused, the Court may grant appropriate relief, including directions affecting prosecution evidence or expeditious continuation of the trial; on the facts described, relief was granted for violation of the right.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171361</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>