<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (10) TMI 1140 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171357</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the High Court&#039;s judgment and restoring the Trial Court and First Appellate Court&#039;s decisions in favor of the plaintiff. The Court emphasized the importance of readiness and willingness to perform a contract, clarified that time was not the essence of the contract, and upheld that the plaintiff had not voluntarily abandoned the contract. The plaintiff was found entitled to relief as she had timely pursued her rights.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2015 16:04:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=390599" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (10) TMI 1140 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171357</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the High Court&#039;s judgment and restoring the Trial Court and First Appellate Court&#039;s decisions in favor of the plaintiff. The Court emphasized the importance of readiness and willingness to perform a contract, clarified that time was not the essence of the contract, and upheld that the plaintiff had not voluntarily abandoned the contract. The plaintiff was found entitled to relief as she had timely pursued her rights.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171357</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>