<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (11) TMI 468 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171351</link>
    <description>Report of a civil customs appeal titled Commissioner v. Kanchan Industries, noting the Supreme Court citation and panel composition; the appeal was dismissed on the stated date. The text contains no substantive reasoning or statutory interpretation; it records only the procedural outcome and citation details, identifying the judges on the bench and the dismissal of the appeal without elaboration on legal principles or facts determinative of the result.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2015 12:08:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=390576" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (11) TMI 468 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171351</link>
      <description>Report of a civil customs appeal titled Commissioner v. Kanchan Industries, noting the Supreme Court citation and panel composition; the appeal was dismissed on the stated date. The text contains no substantive reasoning or statutory interpretation; it records only the procedural outcome and citation details, identifying the judges on the bench and the dismissal of the appeal without elaboration on legal principles or facts determinative of the result.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171351</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>