https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171347 The Andhra Pradesh Scheduled Areas Land Transfer Regulation, 1959 was construed as prospective because it contained no express retrospective wording and no necessary implication to invalidate completed pre-commencement transfers. The rule deeming certain transfers void operated only on transfers made after the relevant provision came into force, while the evidence rule in Section 3(1)(b) did not expand the substantive prohibition. Section 3(2)(a) was held to be ancillary to the substantive voiding provision and could not independently be used to eject persons in possession under transfers that were valid when made. Completed prior transfers and the possession flowing from them therefore remained unaffected. en-us Mon, 18 Sep 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 17 Jul 2015 11:02:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171347 The Andhra Pradesh Scheduled Areas Land Transfer Regulation, 1959 was construed as prospective because it contained no express retrospective wording and no necessary implication to invalidate completed pre-commencement transfers. The rule deeming certain transfers void operated only on transfers made after the relevant provision came into force, while the evidence rule in Section 3(1)(b) did not expand the substantive prohibition. Section 3(2)(a) was held to be ancillary to the substantive voiding provision and could not independently be used to eject persons in possession under transfers that were valid when made. Completed prior transfers and the possession flowing from them therefore remained unaffected. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 18 Sep 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171347