<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (9) TMI 372 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171347</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court held that the Andhra Pradesh (Scheduled Areas) Land Transfer Regulation of 1959 and subsequent amendments were prospective in nature and did not affect transactions made before their enactment. The Court concluded that the authorities under the Regulations lacked jurisdiction to deal with past transactions. Consequently, the Court dismissed the appeals by the authorities and allowed the appeal by T. Rajaiah, with no order as to costs in all appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2015 11:02:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=390569" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (9) TMI 372 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171347</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court held that the Andhra Pradesh (Scheduled Areas) Land Transfer Regulation of 1959 and subsequent amendments were prospective in nature and did not affect transactions made before their enactment. The Court concluded that the authorities under the Regulations lacked jurisdiction to deal with past transactions. Consequently, the Court dismissed the appeals by the authorities and allowed the appeal by T. Rajaiah, with no order as to costs in all appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171347</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>