<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (10) TMI 578 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171346</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the deletion of trading addition under section 145 of the Income Tax Act as the Assessing Officer failed to provide a basis for applying a 20% gross profit rate. Additionally, the Tribunal found the reduction of car maintenance expenses, depreciation on car, and telephone expenses from 20% to 10% by the Ld. CIT(A) to be reasonable and appropriate, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2015 11:00:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=390568" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (10) TMI 578 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171346</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the deletion of trading addition under section 145 of the Income Tax Act as the Assessing Officer failed to provide a basis for applying a 20% gross profit rate. Additionally, the Tribunal found the reduction of car maintenance expenses, depreciation on car, and telephone expenses from 20% to 10% by the Ld. CIT(A) to be reasonable and appropriate, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171346</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>