https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171344 Section 100-A of the Code of Civil Procedure is construed purposively to bar a further Letters Patent Appeal after a Single Judge decides an appeal under Order 43 Rule 1. Allowing an intra-court appeal from an interlocutory order would undermine the statutory aim of reducing successive appeals, particularly where final judgments face greater appellate restrictions. Interference under Article 136 is ordinarily unwarranted where the underlying dispute remains interlocutory in substance, notwithstanding the final form of the Single Judge's judgment. The legal position therefore curtails further intra-court appeals and limits Supreme Court intervention in interlocutory matters. en-us Mon, 25 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 30 Oct 2015 08:57:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171344 Section 100-A of the Code of Civil Procedure is construed purposively to bar a further Letters Patent Appeal after a Single Judge decides an appeal under Order 43 Rule 1. Allowing an intra-court appeal from an interlocutory order would undermine the statutory aim of reducing successive appeals, particularly where final judgments face greater appellate restrictions. Interference under Article 136 is ordinarily unwarranted where the underlying dispute remains interlocutory in substance, notwithstanding the final form of the Single Judge's judgment. The legal position therefore curtails further intra-court appeals and limits Supreme Court intervention in interlocutory matters. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 25 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171344