https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171344 The Supreme Court held that Letters Patent Appeals (LPAs) filed after the amendment of Section 100-A of the Code of Civil Procedure in 2002 are not maintainable against judgments of Single Judges. The Court emphasized that subsequent enactments can restrict the right of appeal and that the purpose of Section 100-A is to reduce the number of appeals. By upholding the Full Bench's decision, the Court aimed to ensure consistency in appellate procedures, prevent excessive appeals, and avoid undue harassment of litigants. The Court's interpretation aligned with the legislative intent to streamline the appeal process and reduce the burden on the judiciary. en-us Mon, 25 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 30 Oct 2015 08:57:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171344 The Supreme Court held that Letters Patent Appeals (LPAs) filed after the amendment of Section 100-A of the Code of Civil Procedure in 2002 are not maintainable against judgments of Single Judges. The Court emphasized that subsequent enactments can restrict the right of appeal and that the purpose of Section 100-A is to reduce the number of appeals. By upholding the Full Bench's decision, the Court aimed to ensure consistency in appellate procedures, prevent excessive appeals, and avoid undue harassment of litigants. The Court's interpretation aligned with the legislative intent to streamline the appeal process and reduce the burden on the judiciary. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 25 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171344