<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 1068 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171341</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the prohibition under Rule 3(4) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 pertains to duties of excise, not Service Tax. Consequently, the Tribunal granted a waiver of pre-deposit and stayed further recovery proceedings, finding the impugned order unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2015 11:27:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=390559" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 1068 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171341</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the prohibition under Rule 3(4) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 pertains to duties of excise, not Service Tax. Consequently, the Tribunal granted a waiver of pre-deposit and stayed further recovery proceedings, finding the impugned order unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171341</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>