<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 1069 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171342</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed by the Tribunal due to a delay in filing and the deemed valid service of the order under Section 37C(1)(b) of the Central Excise Act. Despite the appellant&#039;s argument regarding the lack of actual receipt of the order, the Tribunal held that the service method followed by the Revenue complied with the statutory provisions. The Tribunal concluded that the appeal could not be entertained based on legal provisions, ultimately resulting in its dismissal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2015 15:09:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=390557" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 1069 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171342</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed by the Tribunal due to a delay in filing and the deemed valid service of the order under Section 37C(1)(b) of the Central Excise Act. Despite the appellant&#039;s argument regarding the lack of actual receipt of the order, the Tribunal held that the service method followed by the Revenue complied with the statutory provisions. The Tribunal concluded that the appeal could not be entertained based on legal provisions, ultimately resulting in its dismissal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171342</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>