<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 593 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261632</link>
    <description>The court quashed the recovery notices issued under Section 87 of the Finance Act, 1994, as they were premature and contrary to statutory provisions due to lack of prior adjudication under Section 73. The court directed the respondents to refund the recovered amounts to the respective bank accounts, emphasizing that recovery proceedings must follow proper adjudication procedures.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 11:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=390556" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 593 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261632</link>
      <description>The court quashed the recovery notices issued under Section 87 of the Finance Act, 1994, as they were premature and contrary to statutory provisions due to lack of prior adjudication under Section 73. The court directed the respondents to refund the recovered amounts to the respective bank accounts, emphasizing that recovery proceedings must follow proper adjudication procedures.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261632</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>