https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261628 The appellant's appeal against the order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) was partially successful as the penalty under Section 76 was dropped, but the primary adjudication order demanding service tax, interest, and penalty under Section 78 was upheld. The appellant's defense regarding refurbishment services and service tax remittance was rejected, and it was determined that the appellant provided taxable services, collected service tax, and was liable for the confirmed demand. The appellant was given 30 days to remit the assessed amounts for compliance. The appeal was ultimately dismissed without costs, affirming the correctness of the impugned order. en-us Fri, 10 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 Jan 2016 11:41:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261628 The appellant's appeal against the order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) was partially successful as the penalty under Section 76 was dropped, but the primary adjudication order demanding service tax, interest, and penalty under Section 78 was upheld. The appellant's defense regarding refurbishment services and service tax remittance was rejected, and it was determined that the appellant provided taxable services, collected service tax, and was liable for the confirmed demand. The appellant was given 30 days to remit the assessed amounts for compliance. The appeal was ultimately dismissed without costs, affirming the correctness of the impugned order. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 10 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261628