<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 586 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261625</link>
    <description>The court partially allowed the writ petitions by quashing premature demand and garnishee notices. The respondent was directed to dispose of rectification applications promptly, granting the petitioner the liberty to submit additional material. The court emphasized adherence to statutory procedures without expressing an opinion on the case&#039;s merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2016 15:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=390547" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 586 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261625</link>
      <description>The court partially allowed the writ petitions by quashing premature demand and garnishee notices. The respondent was directed to dispose of rectification applications promptly, granting the petitioner the liberty to submit additional material. The court emphasized adherence to statutory procedures without expressing an opinion on the case&#039;s merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261625</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>