https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261622 The Tribunal found that the appellants had access to the necessary documents for participation in the proceedings despite their claims of non-receipt. Goods manufactured were classified under a specific heading and chargeable to duty, rejecting the appellant's exemption claim. Manipulation of descriptions in invoices to evade duty payment was confirmed, leading to penalties and interest imposition. The appellants were given a period to produce supporting documents for cenvat credit claims. Penalties were upheld for appellants involved in fraudulent activities, and the appeals were disposed of accordingly. en-us Fri, 13 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 17 Jul 2015 10:10:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261622 The Tribunal found that the appellants had access to the necessary documents for participation in the proceedings despite their claims of non-receipt. Goods manufactured were classified under a specific heading and chargeable to duty, rejecting the appellant's exemption claim. Manipulation of descriptions in invoices to evade duty payment was confirmed, leading to penalties and interest imposition. The appellants were given a period to produce supporting documents for cenvat credit claims. Penalties were upheld for appellants involved in fraudulent activities, and the appeals were disposed of accordingly. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 13 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261622