<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 582 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261621</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of CENVAT Credit with interest, reduced the penalty on the Appellant, and set aside penalties on other individuals. The judgment considered factual verification, intent to evade tax, and individual involvement in the excess credit availment, concluding that penalties under Section 11AC were not warranted due to clerical errors and heavy workload, rather than intentional evasion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2015 12:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=390543" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 582 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261621</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of CENVAT Credit with interest, reduced the penalty on the Appellant, and set aside penalties on other individuals. The judgment considered factual verification, intent to evade tax, and individual involvement in the excess credit availment, concluding that penalties under Section 11AC were not warranted due to clerical errors and heavy workload, rather than intentional evasion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261621</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>