<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 580 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261619</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the tire manufacturer&#039;s appeal for a cash refund of Rs. 18,90,389/- under Rule 57F (13) for AED (GSI) credit accrued before 1/4/2000, used in manufacturing exported tires. The manufacturer was directed to reverse the remaining credit in their CENVAT Credit Account to be eligible for the refund. Additionally, the Tribunal permitted a refund for the AED (GSI) credit improperly utilized for Basic Excise Duty and Special Excise Duty, in accordance with amended rules. The Tribunal rejected the authorities&#039; argument of the refund claim being time-barred, allowing the appeal and setting aside the initial order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2016 12:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=390541" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 580 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261619</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the tire manufacturer&#039;s appeal for a cash refund of Rs. 18,90,389/- under Rule 57F (13) for AED (GSI) credit accrued before 1/4/2000, used in manufacturing exported tires. The manufacturer was directed to reverse the remaining credit in their CENVAT Credit Account to be eligible for the refund. Additionally, the Tribunal permitted a refund for the AED (GSI) credit improperly utilized for Basic Excise Duty and Special Excise Duty, in accordance with amended rules. The Tribunal rejected the authorities&#039; argument of the refund claim being time-barred, allowing the appeal and setting aside the initial order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261619</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>