<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 578 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261617</link>
    <description>The winding-up petition was admitted, and the workmen were impleaded in the petition. The official liquidator was appointed as the provisional liquidator, with a directive to take charge of the company&#039;s assets. However, the order appointing the provisional liquidator was kept in abeyance for eight weeks to allow for potential modification of the Corporate Debt Restructuring (CDR) Scheme to include the bond-holders. The court encouraged efforts to resolve the issues amicably during this period and restricted the petitioner from publicizing the order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2015 10:09:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=390539" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 578 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261617</link>
      <description>The winding-up petition was admitted, and the workmen were impleaded in the petition. The official liquidator was appointed as the provisional liquidator, with a directive to take charge of the company&#039;s assets. However, the order appointing the provisional liquidator was kept in abeyance for eight weeks to allow for potential modification of the Corporate Debt Restructuring (CDR) Scheme to include the bond-holders. The court encouraged efforts to resolve the issues amicably during this period and restricted the petitioner from publicizing the order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261617</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>