<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 566 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261605</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, directing the exclusion of certain companies from the list of comparables due to turnover and functional dissimilarity. The Assessing Officer was instructed to recalculate the arm&#039;s length price and grant any consequential relief. The stay petition by the assessee was dismissed as infructuous.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2015 10:08:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=390527" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 566 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261605</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, directing the exclusion of certain companies from the list of comparables due to turnover and functional dissimilarity. The Assessing Officer was instructed to recalculate the arm&#039;s length price and grant any consequential relief. The stay petition by the assessee was dismissed as infructuous.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261605</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>