<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 562 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261601</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the levy of penalty under section 271(1)(c) for both assessment years, confirming that the assessee had concealed income and furnished inaccurate particulars. However, the penalty was directed to be recalculated based on the income being classified as long-term capital gain, resulting in a lower tax liability. The appeals were partly allowed, with the quantum of penalty being the only modification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2015 10:08:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=390523" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 562 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261601</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the levy of penalty under section 271(1)(c) for both assessment years, confirming that the assessee had concealed income and furnished inaccurate particulars. However, the penalty was directed to be recalculated based on the income being classified as long-term capital gain, resulting in a lower tax liability. The appeals were partly allowed, with the quantum of penalty being the only modification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261601</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>