<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 560 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261599</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeals, dismissing those filed by the Revenue. The disallowed brand registration expenses were treated as revenue expenditure, transit breakage provisions were allowed, limitation on brand expenses was lifted, and depreciation claim based on reducing WDV was accepted. The decision was consolidated without separate judgments, with a pronouncement date of 10th July 2015.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2015 10:08:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=390521" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 560 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261599</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeals, dismissing those filed by the Revenue. The disallowed brand registration expenses were treated as revenue expenditure, transit breakage provisions were allowed, limitation on brand expenses was lifted, and depreciation claim based on reducing WDV was accepted. The decision was consolidated without separate judgments, with a pronouncement date of 10th July 2015.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261599</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>