<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 559 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261598</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the Assessing Officer&#039;s treatment of vyaj badla income as interest income instead of short-term capital gains. The tribunal also confirmed various decisions related to charging of interest, depreciation disallowance, deduction on exchange rate difference and interest on debtors, exclusion of sales tax and excise duty for deduction calculation, nature of sales tax subsidy, disallowance of depreciation on wooden structures and expenditure on certain projects, and allowed depreciation on assets used during project construction. The outcome resulted in the dismissal of several appeals by the assessee and the revenue, with one appeal partially allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2015 15:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=390520" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 559 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261598</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the Assessing Officer&#039;s treatment of vyaj badla income as interest income instead of short-term capital gains. The tribunal also confirmed various decisions related to charging of interest, depreciation disallowance, deduction on exchange rate difference and interest on debtors, exclusion of sales tax and excise duty for deduction calculation, nature of sales tax subsidy, disallowance of depreciation on wooden structures and expenditure on certain projects, and allowed depreciation on assets used during project construction. The outcome resulted in the dismissal of several appeals by the assessee and the revenue, with one appeal partially allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261598</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>