<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (2) TMI 681 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171319</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the legality of compelling payment of market fees under the Andhra Pradesh (Agricultural Produce and Livestock) Markets Act, 1966, for seeds, ruling that seeds qualify as agricultural produce and are subject to market fees within designated market areas. The Court clarified that the Seeds Act and Seeds (Control) Order focus on quality control, distinct from the regulatory scope of the Andhra Pradesh Act. Insufficient evidence presented by the appellants regarding the seeds&#039; processing and certification led to the dismissal of their appeals, emphasizing the necessity of detailed factual information to differentiate seeds from foodgrains.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2015 10:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=390485" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (2) TMI 681 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171319</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the legality of compelling payment of market fees under the Andhra Pradesh (Agricultural Produce and Livestock) Markets Act, 1966, for seeds, ruling that seeds qualify as agricultural produce and are subject to market fees within designated market areas. The Court clarified that the Seeds Act and Seeds (Control) Order focus on quality control, distinct from the regulatory scope of the Andhra Pradesh Act. Insufficient evidence presented by the appellants regarding the seeds&#039; processing and certification led to the dismissal of their appeals, emphasizing the necessity of detailed factual information to differentiate seeds from foodgrains.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171319</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>