https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171306 Section 47 of the Code of Civil Procedure permits the executing court to decide questions of execution, discharge and satisfaction, but Order XXI Rule 2 imposes a specific bar on recognising any payment or adjustment of a decree that has not been certified or recorded. An alleged post-decree arrangement said to have substituted a licence or otherwise satisfied an eviction decree could not be enforced in execution because it was neither certified nor recorded, and a licence did not, on the pleaded facts, amount to a fresh lease or surrender of rights under the decree. The statutory restriction prevailed, so the eviction decree remained executable. en-us Tue, 10 Dec 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 01 Jul 2025 13:06:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171306 Section 47 of the Code of Civil Procedure permits the executing court to decide questions of execution, discharge and satisfaction, but Order XXI Rule 2 imposes a specific bar on recognising any payment or adjustment of a decree that has not been certified or recorded. An alleged post-decree arrangement said to have substituted a licence or otherwise satisfied an eviction decree could not be enforced in execution because it was neither certified nor recorded, and a licence did not, on the pleaded facts, amount to a fresh lease or surrender of rights under the decree. The statutory restriction prevailed, so the eviction decree remained executable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 10 Dec 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171306