https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171303 Section 8A of the Capital of Punjab (Development and Regulation) Act, 1952 is described as a controlled resumption power aimed at protecting Chandigarh's planned development, ecology, sanitation and beauty. The provision is presented as valid because it is accompanied by notice, opportunity to show cause, consideration of the explanation, recorded reasons, and appellate and revisional remedies, making the power discretionary and not unguided or arbitrary. Rule 11-D is explained as only an enabling, discretionary reallotment remedy; once resumption becomes final, no vested right to reallotment survives, and an unexplained 13-year delay was treated as insufficient. The prior final decision also bars re-agitation of the same challenge. en-us Wed, 11 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 15 Jul 2015 18:49:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171303 Section 8A of the Capital of Punjab (Development and Regulation) Act, 1952 is described as a controlled resumption power aimed at protecting Chandigarh's planned development, ecology, sanitation and beauty. The provision is presented as valid because it is accompanied by notice, opportunity to show cause, consideration of the explanation, recorded reasons, and appellate and revisional remedies, making the power discretionary and not unguided or arbitrary. Rule 11-D is explained as only an enabling, discretionary reallotment remedy; once resumption becomes final, no vested right to reallotment survives, and an unexplained 13-year delay was treated as insufficient. The prior final decision also bars re-agitation of the same challenge. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 11 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171303