<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (12) TMI 380 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171297</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the decision on merits and principles of natural justice. The rejection of review petitions was upheld, emphasizing that the petitioners had the opportunity to submit supplementary materials. The court clarified that the Antulay case did not apply to the situation at hand, leading to the dismissal of the writ petition without prejudice to seeking other legal remedies.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2015 18:21:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=390388" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (12) TMI 380 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171297</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the decision on merits and principles of natural justice. The rejection of review petitions was upheld, emphasizing that the petitioners had the opportunity to submit supplementary materials. The court clarified that the Antulay case did not apply to the situation at hand, leading to the dismissal of the writ petition without prejudice to seeking other legal remedies.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171297</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>