https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171293 Chapter IV of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 preserved the ordinary power to apply for stage carriage permits, even though Chapter IVA provided a special scheme for a State transport undertaking to obtain permits as of right under an approved scheme. The Court held that the special procedure did not impliedly exclude resort to the general permitting provision, because Section 42(3)(a) remained clear and unqualified and expressio unius could not override the text. The constitutional challenge also failed: State participation in transport business was permissible under Article 19(6), and no Article 14 violation was established merely because permits were granted to the State and refused to the petitioner. en-us Mon, 07 Mar 1960 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 15 Jul 2015 17:23:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171293 Chapter IV of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 preserved the ordinary power to apply for stage carriage permits, even though Chapter IVA provided a special scheme for a State transport undertaking to obtain permits as of right under an approved scheme. The Court held that the special procedure did not impliedly exclude resort to the general permitting provision, because Section 42(3)(a) remained clear and unqualified and expressio unius could not override the text. The constitutional challenge also failed: State participation in transport business was permissible under Article 19(6), and no Article 14 violation was established merely because permits were granted to the State and refused to the petitioner. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 07 Mar 1960 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171293