<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (1) TMI 1322 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171288</link>
    <description>The Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 operates as a self-contained State development code for planned development, with acquisition treated as incidental to that object. Its reference to the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 is limited to provisions consistent with the State scheme, and later amendments are not imported wholesale. Section 11A of the Land Acquisition Act, which causes lapse for failure to make an award in time, does not apply because the State Act already contains its own machinery and default consequence under Section 27. The Act is traceable in pith and substance to the State List, and no repugnancy arises with the general acquisition law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2015 19:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=390378" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (1) TMI 1322 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171288</link>
      <description>The Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 operates as a self-contained State development code for planned development, with acquisition treated as incidental to that object. Its reference to the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 is limited to provisions consistent with the State scheme, and later amendments are not imported wholesale. Section 11A of the Land Acquisition Act, which causes lapse for failure to make an award in time, does not apply because the State Act already contains its own machinery and default consequence under Section 27. The Act is traceable in pith and substance to the State List, and no repugnancy arises with the general acquisition law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171288</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>