<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 1066 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171275</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution because it remained pending for admission since 2007, repeated adjournments had been sought, and no one appeared for the appellant. The court noted that the appellant had lost interest in pursuing the matter and therefore dismissed the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2015 17:07:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=390361" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 1066 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171275</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution because it remained pending for admission since 2007, repeated adjournments had been sought, and no one appeared for the appellant. The court noted that the appellant had lost interest in pursuing the matter and therefore dismissed the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171275</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>