<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (6) TMI 898 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171277</link>
    <description>The disclosure requirement under Regulation 7(1A) read with Regulation 7(2) of the takeover regulations applied to both purchase and sale of shares, including transactions within the promoter group. A purchaser&#039;s disclosure did not remove the seller&#039;s separate obligation to disclose the sale, and disclosure under the insider trading regulations did not satisfy the takeover disclosure duty. The bonus-share decision was distinguished because this matter involved an actual sale attracting the disclosure regime. The penalty under Section 15A(b) was therefore upheld, and the challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2015 15:33:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=390351" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (6) TMI 898 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171277</link>
      <description>The disclosure requirement under Regulation 7(1A) read with Regulation 7(2) of the takeover regulations applied to both purchase and sale of shares, including transactions within the promoter group. A purchaser&#039;s disclosure did not remove the seller&#039;s separate obligation to disclose the sale, and disclosure under the insider trading regulations did not satisfy the takeover disclosure duty. The bonus-share decision was distinguished because this matter involved an actual sale attracting the disclosure regime. The penalty under Section 15A(b) was therefore upheld, and the challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171277</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>