<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (1) TMI 520 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171258</link>
    <description>Reservation and nomination of weaker sections and women in the management committees of co-operative societies under the U.P. Co-operative Societies Act, 1965 and Rules, 1968 were upheld as constitutionally valid. The SC held that membership and management rights in a co-operative society are statutory, subject to the Act, Rules and bye-laws, and not an independent fundamental right under Article 19(1)(c). The scheme was found consistent with the Preamble and Articles 38 and 46, with adequate guidelines for identifying entitled classes, and it was not arbitrary or uncanalised under Article 14. The impugned provisions were therefore intra vires.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2015 14:39:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=390337" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (1) TMI 520 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171258</link>
      <description>Reservation and nomination of weaker sections and women in the management committees of co-operative societies under the U.P. Co-operative Societies Act, 1965 and Rules, 1968 were upheld as constitutionally valid. The SC held that membership and management rights in a co-operative society are statutory, subject to the Act, Rules and bye-laws, and not an independent fundamental right under Article 19(1)(c). The scheme was found consistent with the Preamble and Articles 38 and 46, with adequate guidelines for identifying entitled classes, and it was not arbitrary or uncanalised under Article 14. The impugned provisions were therefore intra vires.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171258</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>