https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171247 A writ petition under Article 226 was not maintainable for a bare claim of interest or damages for delayed payment of the exchange value of high denomination bank notes, particularly where the claim was stale and filed long after release of the amount. The Court treated the bank's disclosure of deposit particulars to the income-tax authorities as justified where disclosure was compelled by law or supported by public duty, and therefore not actionable. The challenge to provisional attachment under the Income-tax Act did not establish any basis for the monetary relief sought in writ proceedings. The petition was dismissed and no consequential monetary relief was granted. en-us Mon, 19 Nov 1984 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 15 Jul 2015 11:32:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171247 A writ petition under Article 226 was not maintainable for a bare claim of interest or damages for delayed payment of the exchange value of high denomination bank notes, particularly where the claim was stale and filed long after release of the amount. The Court treated the bank's disclosure of deposit particulars to the income-tax authorities as justified where disclosure was compelled by law or supported by public duty, and therefore not actionable. The challenge to provisional attachment under the Income-tax Act did not establish any basis for the monetary relief sought in writ proceedings. The petition was dismissed and no consequential monetary relief was granted. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 19 Nov 1984 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171247