https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261534 A criminal complaint under Section 630 of the Companies Act, 1956 was held vulnerable where the board resolution authorising its institution was itself under challenge and the complaint had been filed despite earlier status quo orders. The Court also treated examination of the complainant on oath under Section 200 CrPC as mandatory, and found the defect in the pre-summoning process could not be dismissed as a mere defence on these facts. The complaint and summoning order were quashed, and further proceedings were stayed pending determination of the validity of the board resolution. en-us Fri, 05 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 15 Jul 2015 06:55:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261534 A criminal complaint under Section 630 of the Companies Act, 1956 was held vulnerable where the board resolution authorising its institution was itself under challenge and the complaint had been filed despite earlier status quo orders. The Court also treated examination of the complainant on oath under Section 200 CrPC as mandatory, and found the defect in the pre-summoning process could not be dismissed as a mere defence on these facts. The complaint and summoning order were quashed, and further proceedings were stayed pending determination of the validity of the board resolution. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 05 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261534