<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 486 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261525</link>
    <description>The court upheld the respondent&#039;s eligibility for exemption under Section 54B of the Income Tax Act for the amount of Rs. 44,76,000 but not for the amount paid by his wife. The court dismissed other questions as they did not raise substantial questions of law. The appeal was partly allowed and partly dismissed, with the court disposing of the appeal accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2015 06:54:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=390282" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 486 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261525</link>
      <description>The court upheld the respondent&#039;s eligibility for exemption under Section 54B of the Income Tax Act for the amount of Rs. 44,76,000 but not for the amount paid by his wife. The court dismissed other questions as they did not raise substantial questions of law. The appeal was partly allowed and partly dismissed, with the court disposing of the appeal accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261525</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>