<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 472 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261511</link>
    <description>Cash credits routed through fixed deposit accounts were not assessable under section 68 where the source was explained through linked transfers and the assessee established identity, genuineness and creditworthiness. Reimbursement of clearing house and service tax charges was not disallowable under section 40(a)(ia) because tax had already been deducted at source on the underlying payment. Repairs and renovation of rented premises were treated as revenue expenditure, as no new enduring asset was created. Payments of petrol, telephone and consultancy to a related person were not hit by section 40A(2)(b) absent proof of excessiveness. Interest on non-performing assets already credited in the books could not be added again, and the RBI KYC penalty was allowed as business expenditure.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2015 06:54:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=390268" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 472 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261511</link>
      <description>Cash credits routed through fixed deposit accounts were not assessable under section 68 where the source was explained through linked transfers and the assessee established identity, genuineness and creditworthiness. Reimbursement of clearing house and service tax charges was not disallowable under section 40(a)(ia) because tax had already been deducted at source on the underlying payment. Repairs and renovation of rented premises were treated as revenue expenditure, as no new enduring asset was created. Payments of petrol, telephone and consultancy to a related person were not hit by section 40A(2)(b) absent proof of excessiveness. Interest on non-performing assets already credited in the books could not be added again, and the RBI KYC penalty was allowed as business expenditure.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261511</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>