https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171242 The Supreme Court dismissed the writ petitions, upholding the High Court's order restraining the publication of court proceedings. It held that the order did not violate the petitioners' fundamental rights under Article 19(1)(a) and (g). The court emphasized that judicial orders are not subject to writ jurisdiction under Article 32 and must be challenged through the appellate process. The inherent powers of the High Court to hold trials in camera or restrict publication were deemed necessary for the fair administration of justice. en-us Thu, 03 Mar 1966 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 14 Jul 2015 18:30:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171242 The Supreme Court dismissed the writ petitions, upholding the High Court's order restraining the publication of court proceedings. It held that the order did not violate the petitioners' fundamental rights under Article 19(1)(a) and (g). The court emphasized that judicial orders are not subject to writ jurisdiction under Article 32 and must be challenged through the appellate process. The inherent powers of the High Court to hold trials in camera or restrict publication were deemed necessary for the fair administration of justice. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 03 Mar 1966 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171242