https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171242 Public trials remain the norm, but a court may in exceptional cases regulate publicity or order proceedings in camera where necessary to protect the administration of justice. The text states that this inherent jurisdiction extends to restraining publication of a witness's evidence during trial, and such an order does not itself amount to a direct infringement of rights under Article 19(1), because any impact on speech, movement or profession is only incidental to a judicial order made in aid of justice. It further explains that certiorari under Article 32 is not ordinarily available to challenge a judicial order of a superior court made within its jurisdiction; the proper recourse is appeal or other appropriate proceedings. en-us Thu, 03 Mar 1966 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 14 Jul 2015 18:30:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171242 Public trials remain the norm, but a court may in exceptional cases regulate publicity or order proceedings in camera where necessary to protect the administration of justice. The text states that this inherent jurisdiction extends to restraining publication of a witness's evidence during trial, and such an order does not itself amount to a direct infringement of rights under Article 19(1), because any impact on speech, movement or profession is only incidental to a judicial order made in aid of justice. It further explains that certiorari under Article 32 is not ordinarily available to challenge a judicial order of a superior court made within its jurisdiction; the proper recourse is appeal or other appropriate proceedings. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 03 Mar 1966 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171242