<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (7) TMI 884 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171236</link>
    <description>The Securities Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal of a stockbroker against penalties imposed by the National Stock Exchange. The tribunal found the penalty for irregularities in maintaining client ledger unjustified due to regulatory ambiguity. It overturned the penalty for not sending contract notes directly to clients within 24 hours, as the appellant complied with regulations by routing them through sub-brokers. The penalty for not displaying the notice board at the sub-broker&#039;s office was dropped. The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the penalties without awarding costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2015 16:56:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=390237" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (7) TMI 884 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171236</link>
      <description>The Securities Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal of a stockbroker against penalties imposed by the National Stock Exchange. The tribunal found the penalty for irregularities in maintaining client ledger unjustified due to regulatory ambiguity. It overturned the penalty for not sending contract notes directly to clients within 24 hours, as the appellant complied with regulations by routing them through sub-brokers. The penalty for not displaying the notice board at the sub-broker&#039;s office was dropped. The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the penalties without awarding costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171236</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>