https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171235 The appellant was accused of manipulating its own shares, publishing false announcements, and manipulating accounts to lure investors. The Tribunal found no evidence linking the appellant to manipulative trading in its shares, deemed the announcements as genuine business plans, and noted the lack of material evidence for manipulation in the accounts. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, the impugned order was set aside, and no costs were awarded. en-us Wed, 15 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 14 Jul 2015 16:44:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171235 The appellant was accused of manipulating its own shares, publishing false announcements, and manipulating accounts to lure investors. The Tribunal found no evidence linking the appellant to manipulative trading in its shares, deemed the announcements as genuine business plans, and noted the lack of material evidence for manipulation in the accounts. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, the impugned order was set aside, and no costs were awarded. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 15 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171235