<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (9) TMI 920 - Gujarat HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171229</link>
    <description>HC allowed appeals challenging modification of Appointed Date in amalgamation scheme. The Company Court&#039;s alteration from 1st April 2008 to 1st April 2009 was set aside. Original scheme was sanctioned without modification, finding no cogent reasons for changing the Appointed Date. Civil Applications were disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 10:53:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=390216" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (9) TMI 920 - Gujarat HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171229</link>
      <description>HC allowed appeals challenging modification of Appointed Date in amalgamation scheme. The Company Court&#039;s alteration from 1st April 2008 to 1st April 2009 was set aside. Original scheme was sanctioned without modification, finding no cogent reasons for changing the Appointed Date. Civil Applications were disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171229</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>