<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1975 (8) TMI 127 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171224</link>
    <description>Section 6(1) of the Gujarat Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1964 is read to require Gujarati newspaper publication for every notification issued under section 6, including a section 6(5) notification, because the phrase &quot;this section&quot; covers the entire statutory scheme and the use of &quot;shall&quot; indicates a mandatory condition designed to secure effective public notice. A notification enlarging the list of agricultural produce is therefore invalid if not so published, and any prosecution founded on that notification cannot stand. On that reasoning, the conviction was set aside, the acquittal restored, and the fine ordered to be refunded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2015 11:45:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=390206" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1975 (8) TMI 127 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171224</link>
      <description>Section 6(1) of the Gujarat Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1964 is read to require Gujarati newspaper publication for every notification issued under section 6, including a section 6(5) notification, because the phrase &quot;this section&quot; covers the entire statutory scheme and the use of &quot;shall&quot; indicates a mandatory condition designed to secure effective public notice. A notification enlarging the list of agricultural produce is therefore invalid if not so published, and any prosecution founded on that notification cannot stand. On that reasoning, the conviction was set aside, the acquittal restored, and the fine ordered to be refunded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171224</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>