https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171225 The court held that a person appointed under Article 224A of the Constitution is considered a judge of the High Court for the purpose of trying an election petition under Section 80A of the Representation of the People Act, 1951. It was also determined that the Chief Justice has the authority to reallocate an election petition from one judge to another, especially upon the request of the initially assigned judge. The court directed the election petition to be tried by a permanent judge of the High Court assigned by the Chief Justice, setting aside the previous order. The appeal was allowed, and parties were directed to bear their own costs. en-us Thu, 08 Nov 1973 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 14 Jul 2015 11:45:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171225 The court held that a person appointed under Article 224A of the Constitution is considered a judge of the High Court for the purpose of trying an election petition under Section 80A of the Representation of the People Act, 1951. It was also determined that the Chief Justice has the authority to reallocate an election petition from one judge to another, especially upon the request of the initially assigned judge. The court directed the election petition to be tried by a permanent judge of the High Court assigned by the Chief Justice, setting aside the previous order. The appeal was allowed, and parties were directed to bear their own costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 08 Nov 1973 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171225