<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (2) TMI 1128 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171221</link>
    <description>Reduced penalty under the proviso to section 11AC of the Central Excise Act may be available where the duty amount was not re-determined in appeal. Earlier decisions supported extending the option to pay 25% of the penalty within the prescribed period in appropriate circumstances. The adjudicating authority should expressly communicate this option in the order-in-original. Where duty has already been paid and the requirements for interest and reduced-penalty payment were not clearly communicated, denying the benefit would be unjust. The Tribunal&#039;s grant of the reduced-penalty option was consistent with the applicable view, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2015 11:22:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=390202" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (2) TMI 1128 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171221</link>
      <description>Reduced penalty under the proviso to section 11AC of the Central Excise Act may be available where the duty amount was not re-determined in appeal. Earlier decisions supported extending the option to pay 25% of the penalty within the prescribed period in appropriate circumstances. The adjudicating authority should expressly communicate this option in the order-in-original. Where duty has already been paid and the requirements for interest and reduced-penalty payment were not clearly communicated, denying the benefit would be unjust. The Tribunal&#039;s grant of the reduced-penalty option was consistent with the applicable view, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171221</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>