https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171220 The Supreme Court upheld the Division Bench's judgment, quashing the complaint petition by the District Judge. It ruled that the Land Acquisition Judge is not subordinate to the District Judge for Section 340 CrPC purposes. The appeal was dismissed, and the High Court was tasked with promptly executing the Division Bench's decision. No costs were awarded. en-us Fri, 10 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 24 Nov 2015 10:28:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171220 The Supreme Court upheld the Division Bench's judgment, quashing the complaint petition by the District Judge. It ruled that the Land Acquisition Judge is not subordinate to the District Judge for Section 340 CrPC purposes. The appeal was dismissed, and the High Court was tasked with promptly executing the Division Bench's decision. No costs were awarded. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 10 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171220