https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171217 Rule 4(2) of the Indian Administrative Service (Cadre) Rules, 1954 requires cadre strength and composition to be re-examined ordinarily every five years, and the word "ordinarily" permits departure only in exceptional circumstances. The text states that the 2003 cadre review for the Uttar Pradesh IAS cadre was due, and the delay was not justified because it stemmed from inaction rather than any acceptable cause. It also states that the delayed review and notification were not retrospectively operative as a general rule, but equitable relief could be moulded where official delay prejudiced eligible State Civil Service officers' promotional consideration, with Article 142 used to mitigate hardship. en-us Tue, 23 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 31 Oct 2015 08:49:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171217 Rule 4(2) of the Indian Administrative Service (Cadre) Rules, 1954 requires cadre strength and composition to be re-examined ordinarily every five years, and the word "ordinarily" permits departure only in exceptional circumstances. The text states that the 2003 cadre review for the Uttar Pradesh IAS cadre was due, and the delay was not justified because it stemmed from inaction rather than any acceptable cause. It also states that the delayed review and notification were not retrospectively operative as a general rule, but equitable relief could be moulded where official delay prejudiced eligible State Civil Service officers' promotional consideration, with Article 142 used to mitigate hardship. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 23 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171217