https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261505 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing them to avail CENVAT credit for input services utilized before 01.03.2006, despite booking the credit post a new notification disallowing such credit. The Tribunal referenced a Bombay High Court ruling and a CBEC Circular, emphasizing the absence of a specific bar in the subsequent notification against allowing the credit. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the disallowance of credit and imposed penalties, granting the appellant consequential benefits. en-us Thu, 09 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 29 Feb 2016 12:03:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261505 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing them to avail CENVAT credit for input services utilized before 01.03.2006, despite booking the credit post a new notification disallowing such credit. The Tribunal referenced a Bombay High Court ruling and a CBEC Circular, emphasizing the absence of a specific bar in the subsequent notification against allowing the credit. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the disallowance of credit and imposed penalties, granting the appellant consequential benefits. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 09 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261505