<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 460 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261499</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the duty demand of Rs. 16,57,293/- for the period from 01.04.2004 to 26.10.2004 along with interest and equivalent penalty. However, the duty demand of Rs. 26,12,951/- for the period from 01.04.2001 to 31.03.2004 was set aside. The penalty on the Director was reduced to Rs. 10,000. The appeals filed by the appellant company and its Director were partly allowed, while the appeal filed by the Revenue was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2016 14:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=390182" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 460 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261499</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the duty demand of Rs. 16,57,293/- for the period from 01.04.2004 to 26.10.2004 along with interest and equivalent penalty. However, the duty demand of Rs. 26,12,951/- for the period from 01.04.2001 to 31.03.2004 was set aside. The penalty on the Director was reduced to Rs. 10,000. The appeals filed by the appellant company and its Director were partly allowed, while the appeal filed by the Revenue was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261499</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>