https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261497 The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the appellants, setting aside the duty demand and penalties imposed on the main appellant and its Director. The serious charges of clandestine production and illicit removal of goods were not proven beyond reasonable doubt due to lack of tangible evidence. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of tangible evidence and corroborative support, stating that suspicion cannot replace evidence. However, the duty demand for the shortage of finished goods was confirmed. en-us Tue, 30 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 14 Jul 2015 17:55:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261497 The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the appellants, setting aside the duty demand and penalties imposed on the main appellant and its Director. The serious charges of clandestine production and illicit removal of goods were not proven beyond reasonable doubt due to lack of tangible evidence. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of tangible evidence and corroborative support, stating that suspicion cannot replace evidence. However, the duty demand for the shortage of finished goods was confirmed. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 30 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261497