<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 453 - COMPANY LAW BOARD NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261492</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the relief sought under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, as the grievances of the petitioners were deemed to amount to oppression beyond the scope of the MoU and its arbitration clause. The court also dismissed the reliefs sought against non-parties due to the petitioners&#039; failure to include them in the proceedings. Consequently, CA 143/2014 was partly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2015 17:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=390175" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 453 - COMPANY LAW BOARD NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261492</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the relief sought under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, as the grievances of the petitioners were deemed to amount to oppression beyond the scope of the MoU and its arbitration clause. The court also dismissed the reliefs sought against non-parties due to the petitioners&#039; failure to include them in the proceedings. Consequently, CA 143/2014 was partly allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261492</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>