<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 447 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261486</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the First Appellate Authority&#039;s decisions, ruling the reassessment proceedings invalid under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act due to lack of new tangible material, and deleting the disallowance under Section 36(1)(iii) as advances were made for business purposes from sufficient own funds. The Revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2015 16:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=390169" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 447 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261486</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the First Appellate Authority&#039;s decisions, ruling the reassessment proceedings invalid under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act due to lack of new tangible material, and deleting the disallowance under Section 36(1)(iii) as advances were made for business purposes from sufficient own funds. The Revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261486</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>